Visitor Question

Workmans Comp Question…

Submitted By: Damon (Lafayette, IN)

I was on a temporary work assignment and suffered a heat stroke. I was taken to the emergency room by an ambulance and treated. My question is, since this happened at work, is the company responsible for the cost of the ambulance and hospital charges?

Disclaimer: Our response is not formal legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. It is generic legal information based on the very limited information provided. Do not rely upon the information in our response, or anywhere else on this site, when deciding the proper course of a legal matter. Always get a personalized case review from a local attorney.


Dear Damon,

Whether your employer is responsible hinges entirely upon whether you were on the job working within the scope of your employment when your heat stroke occurred. Here are three hypothetical examples to explain:

Hypo 1: Edward the Employee was working for Bob the Builder at a job site. Edward forgot his water and did not ask for any. He was assigned to paint cabinets to be installed in a home and Bob the builder supplied an outdoor pop up to provide shade under which the employees could perform their tasks.

Edward chose to drag his cabinets out into the sun claiming they would dry faster. His employer kept admonishing him to do his tasks under the pop-up. During the day he suffered heat stroke.

Hypo 2: Edward the Employee was laying shingles on a roof at a job-site for Bob the Builder. Edward took regular breaks and remained hydrated all day. It was a record hot day, however and within hours, Edward suffered heat stroke.

Hypo 3: Edward the Employee went to the nearest burger joint during his lunch break, sat outdoors and drank a beer. While at his lunch break, he suffered heat stroke.

In hypothetical #1, Edward was working against his employers directions and ignoring safety precautions put in place. Therefore, even though his heat stroke occurred while at work, his employer is likely not responsible.

In hypothetical #2: Edward was working within the scope of his employment and was injured, therefore his employer is likely responsible.

In hypothetical #3: Edward was outside of the scope (i.e. lunch break) and therefore, his employer is likely not responsible.

The above is general information. Laws change frequently, and across jurisdictions. You should get a personalized case evaluation from a licensed attorney. Find a local attorney to give you a free case review here , or call (888) 647-2490.

Best of luck,

Published: May 24, 2010

How Much is Your Injury Claim Worth?

Find out now with a FREE case review from an attorney…

  • Your Accident
  • Your Claim
  • Contact Info
  • Your Evaluation
array(1) {
  object(WP_Term)#2437 (11) {
    string(65) "Essentials of Work Injury Claims and Workers' Compensation Law..."
    string(11) "page_id_515"
    string(12) "icc_qa_group"
    string(0) ""
    string(3) "raw"
    string(3) "283"

One thought on “Workmans Comp Question…

  1. What if Hypo 3 went like this?

    Hypo 3: Edward the Employee went to the nearest burger joint during his lunch break, sat outdoors and drank a beer. He returned to work and followed the employer’s instructions and suffered from heat stroke while working.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *